Internal Server Error

The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to complete your request.

Please contact the server administrator, webmaster@j-query.org and inform them of the time the error occurred, and anything you might have done that may have caused the error.

More information about this error may be available in the server error log.

Additionally, a 404 Not Found error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.



Review http://newbiemarketers.net on alexa.com

Archives

Todays Give Away

IMLoop

BlogTopSites & Directories

Rave on SocialSafelist

Plagiarism, not cool at all

Plagiarism is publishing articles from others as your own without permission as Arthur pointed out in his comment. I have seen it many times on several networks. People post articles of others without mentioning the source. I do not think it is OK to do so. It can backfire on you if you publish content that is not your own.

Many article directories explicitly say that you may use the articles but that you must mention the source and give the original author credit. If you read their TOS you can be in big trouble if you don’t; the original author might start a law suit against you.


What about PLR articles where the author is unknown?

Well you won’t get in any legal trouble. Still I recommended adding a note that it is a PLR article or just write as source “author unknown”. Why? What if you get feedback from people asking you questions and you can’t answer them? You would look pretty dumb. And why should you use a PLR article if you know much about the subject yourself? It is much better than to write your own articles on that subject. They will rank much better in search engines than copy/paste articles or articles from an article spinner in my opinion; SEO experts correct me if I am wrong.

Don’t think people won’t find out. People that read a lot will remember if they saw an article before elsewhere. There are also services that can search for duplicate content.

Sometimes it is so obvious that an article is plagiarism that it makes me laugh (although it is really not funny at all). When somebody who’s native language is not English and who’s comments on articles are very poor English, or has a profile in very poor English, is very unlikely to write a number of articles in perfect English unless he hired a ghost writer. 9 of 10 times the same content can be found when you perform a search.

So be honest and don’t publish content of others under your own name unless you have explicit permission of the owner of the original owner like is the case of some syndicated posts on this blog. Don’t be a copy cat and mention your sources, people will respect you for that.

If you are having trouble writing articles i would like to refer to the article “Are you having trouble writing quality articles that let your readers crave for more?”

2 comments to Plagiarism, not cool at all

  • Original unique content is always best. When incorporating the works of others it’s good from a human standpoint to not rely on the knowledge of others because it’s you who will be asked the questions in comments etc..

    As to how search bots see it is a matter of debate. While Google and them say they penalize duplicate content the highest PR Sites are typically Wikipedia and Article Directories, News Sites, and Authors forums where 90% of the content on site appears somewhere else first. The spiders send a red flag and then a human editor has to review the site and decide if it’s a proper context for duplicate content and remove the flag. In some cases and site types duplicate content builds authority instead of being penalized.

    Andy Anderson
    SEO and Social Media Enthusiast
    CEO Kooiii Business Resources

  • Plagiarism is the use of the work of others without permission. Where unconditional rights of reproduction are granted – that is re-distribution or re-publishing – you are free to use the article as you see fit. In reality, duplicate content is only penalised within the same domain because, generally, it represents a form of keyword stuffing. Also, in reality, it is inevitable that the thousands of people who think they are submitting unique articles are deluding themselves. If they research the same topic to write about, the chances are that their results will be very similar. Millions of articles are written and published every day and most of them are 300 to 600 words long so duplication is inevitable where the subjects are massively over-subscribed (like “how to set up a sales funnel”).

Leave a Reply